The Republic Book I Essay Example For Students

The Republic Book I Essay Most normal individuals in the modern world would assume that all books written, not published, by man are based on either a portion of the authors imagination, an event (biased or non-biased) in either history or during the life of the author, a straight-out autobiography, or a generalized biography of another person they once knew. However, this philosophical novel fits none of the descriptions above. The book is actually an in-depth recording of a philosophy contest between Platos teacher Socrates and several other great philosophers. What is significant about this contest is that, in it, Socrates describes his personal view of a perfect world, and why justice is so important in the process of creating a civilized world. We will write a custom essay on The Republic Book I specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now The novel was completed in 370 B.C., and it describes a strong debate between Socrates and five other speakers. The two main arguments that he illustrates in this novel are that a ruler cannot obtain more power than the state, and that a philosopher is best suited to rule a nation since he has the ability to maintain this balance. Also, Socrates claims that only the philosopher has traveled beyond the cave of worldly desires and temptations to discover what justice really is. Socrates first major argument is with Thrasymachus in Book I. The current debate lies on the pure definition of justice. Thrasymachus claims that there is only one principle of justice: the interest of the more dominant force. Socrates counters this argument by using the phrase the stronger. He claims that the ruler of a nation will not be aided, but harmed, by an unintentional command, in the long run. Socrates then builds his argument gradually by stating that the good and just man looks out for the interest o f the weaker, and not for himself. Thrasymachus tries to counter Socratess argument by vaguely proclaiming that injustice is more gainful than justice. However, Socrates bravely explains that the just man will live happily because he has a just soul, and the man with the unjust soul lives in poverty; therefore, injustice can never be greater than justice. At this point in the novel I saw Thrasymachuss flaw and also the reason why Socrates has silenced Thrasymachus. Injustice, in my opinion, may be better as a short-term plan for pleasure, but in the long run the unjust man will be condemned by just men of his evil deeds, thus leading to his downfall. This is a point Thrasymachus failed to see, and thus his argument was too unilateral. This is the reason I believe he lost, and his failure led me to believe that Thrasymachus is a knowledgeable man without wisdom(whereas Socrates had both). After Thrasymachuss defeat, Glaucon steps up to challenge Socrates. Glaucons first argument is that doing injustice and not being punished for it is much more pleasurable than suffering injustice at the hands of unjust rulers and practicing justice. Glaucons brother, Adeimantus, backs up his brothers speech by stating that an unjust man with a deceivably just reputation(which is almost always the trait of the perfectly unjust man) is also better than the just man. But Socrates counters these two strong speeches by proclaiming that, in an average city, justice is needed for the Senate to build the city, for citizens to trade and barter with foreigners, and for training and educating soldiers for battle. Socrates also states that justice comes from God and those who follow his example become just. Although these two arguments are striking contrasted content-wise, there is a connection between them. If a man is unjust, he will not only be condemned by men, but by God as well. And even t hough there may be no Supreme Being that controls the Earth and its neighboring planets, injustice will still cause harm, leading to more injustice and finally the destruction of the world. I am quite positive that Glaucon and Adeimantus are thinking in the same manner as Thrasymachus; they are thinking short-termed and are explaining their arguments in terms of the present. Of course, three unjust men in a world where just people rule could get away with almost any unjust act. But injustice leads to more injustice, as well as justice leads to more justice. Therefore, if the following is considered true, then unjust men leads to more unjust men, and then what would happen if unjust men ruled the world. There would be many intense conflicts, which would lead to violence and hatred, and finally, the destruction of mankind. So therefore in the end, unjust men would lose. .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b , .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b .postImageUrl , .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b , .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b:hover , .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b:visited , .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b:active { border:0!important; } .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b:active , .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Individual Development Plan EssaySocrates continues with his argument by saying that persons of worth should be given the greatest respect and authority, which includes the Greek gods as well. Socrates also claims, using the arts of medicine, music, and gymnastics; that one who practices these arts constantly and repeatedly with disregard to his surroundings will soon become one with the art, and forget about what is really important in a mans life. This act will most definitely lead to injustice. Socrates polishes off the remainder of his argument by stating that the way of life of a man should be a guardian of the State; for they have courage and are never too lazy to pr otect the city from an enemy. The men who have plenty of possessions, however, become greedy and turn against their fellow citizens. During Socratess argument, in my opinion, Adeimantus looks to be stupefied by Socratess great wisdom and knowledge, and how Socrates takes simple points and develops them to defend his argument. However, Adeimantus(unlike the cowardly Thrasymachus) continued to participate in the debate, although saying little much than phrases agreeing with Socratess arguments. In Book IV, Adeimantus proposes a question to Socrates, asking what Socrates would do if someone blamed him for the economic condition of the man. Socrates responds, first of all, that if a man lives by education, courage, and self-mastery, he should have no trouble making a decent living in the modern world. Justice finds its place in these three principles because they are the common traits of the State, which all mankinds should respect and follow. Socrates continues his argument by generally stating throughout a long river of metaphors, symbols, and great understanding, that just men appreciate other just men, but not men opposite of what he is. Unjust men, on the other hand, appreciate neither just men nor other unjust men. The only interest they care about is that of himself. At this point Thrasymachus, Adeimantus, and Glaucon believe that Socrates has gone overboard with his arguments. Socrates replies by saying that it takes great depth inside wisdom and understanding and man y comparisons relating to everyday life to understand what truth really is; the three speakers then resume their positions. Socrates goes on by saying that men who make the best rulers possess not only political understanding and military leadership, but also great wisdom and understanding; therefore these people are the ones who have a complete understanding of what justice is. These rulers could also be philosophers with military experience, or military leaders with a great sense of philosophy. It seemed to me in this point in the novel that Glaucon and the other two were tired of Socratess arguments because they were too long and besides the point. However, as Socrates had said earlier, justice is not merely explained in minutes. It is a subject that must be looked into very closely and with the greatest respect and gravity. Socrates then explains that not all who claim to be philosophers are actually philosophers. At this point in the novel, Socrates explains the difference between those that claim to be philosophers, and those that actually are philosophers. Men who only claim to be philosophers are only thinking of building a reputation. At first they seem to be wiser and more knowledgeable than others, but after they have gained the respect of the citizens, they become corrupt and rule the city unjustly. Real philosophers, however, find that it is in their best interest to govern wisely and make laws fair enough for the good of the people, not for the benefit of the ruler. Real philosophers also have wisdom and understanding, which gives them a better understanding of justice than corrupted rulers. In any case, I am beginning to agree with Glaucon and the others about how Socrates builds his arguments; now its a good thing for a philosopher to start with a simple idea, and then use it to form the bas is of the philosophers opinion. However, in my opinion, Socrates is overdoing the formations of his opinions. For example, in Book VI, Socrates goes on and on about good and evil philosophers; much of what he says is pretty much beside the point, in my opinion. .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc , .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc .postImageUrl , .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc , .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc:hover , .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc:visited , .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc:active { border:0!important; } .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc:active , .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Effects Of Media Essay ThesisSocrates, after the previous argument, goes on to say that there is a difference between what the eyes see and what the mind sees. According to Socrates, the eyes see both small and great, but in a confused manner.(Book VII, section 524) What this means is that the eyes alone cannot distinguish what is right from what is wrong since they contribute to many sins, such as lust, coveting, and several others. After this statement, Socrates claims that the mind was compelled to reverse the process, and look at small and great as separate and not confused. (Book VII, section 524). What this means is that the mind, with the aid of wisdom and knowledge , can sense right from wrong easily. After all of Socratess arguments about justice, Socrates concludes his entire debate by describing what he calls a perfect State. This perfect land was The type of government in this State is democracy(where people rule the land) because then the people can obtain plenty of freedom to achieve their own pleasures without being pushed around by a superior force. In democracy also is equality, since people rule the government, and there is no reason for a man to be treated as an inferior by a fellow citizen. What the State does not have is a tyrant, which Socrates goes into great detail about in Book IX. The tyrant, as Socrates describes, is unable to satisfy anyone but himself. Therefore he has few, if any, friends. The tyrant is also a ruthless ruler; he is hard-hearted and will not forgive anyone of doing wrong to him. Finally, Socrates points out that, in his perfect State, philosophers will always have the advantage over other types of rulers b ecause they have wisdom and knowledge, which gives them the ability to govern justly and wisely. In my opinion, Socratess perfect State sounded plenty like the scenario progressing in the debate. Socrates, since he is a great philosopher, had the advantage over everyone because he was wise and intelligent in his arguments; therefore he obviously knew more about justice than anyone else. So, in conclusion, Socrates won the debate on the definition of justice. The reason for this is because Socrates, as stated before, had the wisdom and knowledge to analyze, in the most descriptive way, what justice really is. Glaucon and the others lacked what Socrates had, and so they could not support their arguments as well as Socrates could. I really liked this novel a lot because I am a lover of philosophy and understanding. However, I must admit that some of Socratess arguments were redundant and besides the point. But other than this crucial flaw, the book showed great insight, and Socrates cr eated a vivid description about what justice means to the modern world. Bibliography:

Free Essays on Philosophy In Teaching

Personal Philosophy of Teaching My personal philosophy of teaching focuses around my beliefs about education and what I hope to accomplish in my future years as a Special Education teacher. My main goal as a future teacher is to create a safe and welcoming classroom for my students. A place where they feel comfortable to be themselves, are motivated to learn and have fun while doing it. The school's of today offer children so much more than simple reading, writing and arithmetic. Yes, academics are the most important components of a school, but schools also give children the opportunity to explore new ideas, learn from and interact with their peers, and to help them become active members of society. I believe that all students, including students with special needs have the right to learn and to reach his/her highest potential, no matter what his/her learning style or pace may be. Each child should be given the opportunity to live, participate, and interact with one another in the same settings which include school, home and the workplace. Education is an ongoing process that begins at birth and continues throughout our entire lives, both in and out of the classroom. I believe it is important to be aware that education involves not only the instruction that takes place in the classroom but the community and the enviornment in which it exists. Therefore, I believe it necessary to incorporate the aspects of everyday life into the curriculum and for parents to be involved in their child's schooling as well. Effective teachers also bring lessons and activities to the classroom that promote interactive group activities where the children learn from each other. Learning is active rather than passive. In order for a child to fully learn something, they need to learn by doing rather than watching. Through group work, the students are able to share their differing ideas with each other, and gain an even bigger picture of the... Free Essays on Philosophy In Teaching Free Essays on Philosophy In Teaching Personal Philosophy of Teaching My personal philosophy of teaching focuses around my beliefs about education and what I hope to accomplish in my future years as a Special Education teacher. My main goal as a future teacher is to create a safe and welcoming classroom for my students. A place where they feel comfortable to be themselves, are motivated to learn and have fun while doing it. The school's of today offer children so much more than simple reading, writing and arithmetic. Yes, academics are the most important components of a school, but schools also give children the opportunity to explore new ideas, learn from and interact with their peers, and to help them become active members of society. I believe that all students, including students with special needs have the right to learn and to reach his/her highest potential, no matter what his/her learning style or pace may be. Each child should be given the opportunity to live, participate, and interact with one another in the same settings which include school, home and the workplace. Education is an ongoing process that begins at birth and continues throughout our entire lives, both in and out of the classroom. I believe it is important to be aware that education involves not only the instruction that takes place in the classroom but the community and the enviornment in which it exists. Therefore, I believe it necessary to incorporate the aspects of everyday life into the curriculum and for parents to be involved in their child's schooling as well. Effective teachers also bring lessons and activities to the classroom that promote interactive group activities where the children learn from each other. Learning is active rather than passive. In order for a child to fully learn something, they need to learn by doing rather than watching. Through group work, the students are able to share their differing ideas with each other, and gain an even bigger picture of the...

Tutoring in high school Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Tutoring in high school - Essay Example I assisted Rose times by helping her organize her backpack because her bag had so many worksheets and she could not find her homework easily. Also, I stayed after homework hours and assisted students with many recreational activities. I worked with students in baking cookies, brownies, puppy chow, and cupcakes for their parents’ meeting. I also played Scrabble with them and a variety card games such as Uno, Egyptian Rat Screw, and Speed. One afternoon we had a girls’ time and Rose painted my fingernails blue. I thought about Rose every moment I saw my fingernails. I interacted with students from diverse backgrounds. Most students get bus tokens to take the city bus home, some live in unstable homes with family problems, and some live in unsafe environments. I gained a sense of their hard lives by tutoring and playing sports with them. I truly felt that I was making a difference in their lives and I enjoyed every minute of it. I hope I can expand my desire to help young children in the

Decision Making, Decision Levels and Types of Problems Term Paper

Decision Making, Decision Levels and Types of Problems - Term Paper Example There are different levels of decision making and types of problems, different types of problems include semi-structured problem, structured problem, and unstructured problem. For every type of problem, there is a different level of decision to be taken and there is a different solution for each type of problem. Normally structured problem as easily solved as compared to the semi-structured and unstructured problems, the reason for that the problem identification is easy because the problem is well structured. The process through which humans resolve and perceive the distance between a current situation and a decided goal is called the problem-solving process. A person has to first identify the obstacles which he or she will face to reach the desired goal and after analytical thinking, a person can overcome these hurdles. (Hicks, 2004) When humans find a solution to a specific problem, they store this information in their memories to use them for future situations. When we closely analyze then we come to know that the steps involved in both decision making and problem-solving are identical and sometimes we use these terms interchangeably. (Skyttner, 2005) The purpose of the input phase is to have a clear understanding of a particular situation; we first recognize the problem or set of problems so that we have a clear picture in our mind. By identifying a problem means that we know to the distance between a present situation and our desired goal. The identification process of any problem is very important to talk to our selves and others. Normally we face four common types of situations. (Adair, 2007) 1. A situation in which we know that something is wrong and we need to correct it. 2. A situation in which we perceive something to be a real threat and we have to prevent it from happening. 3. A situation in which we simply accept the needs and invitations. 4. A situation in which we see something is really missing and it should be provided.     

Aerodynamics and Propulsion principles Coursework

Aerodynamics and Propulsion principles - Coursework Example To understand the operation of a turbofan, first we need to look into its construction and the function of individual components. Figure 1 describes the arrangement of the components of a turbofan and indicates the direction of normal air flow in the engine. All the 5 components: intake, compressor, combustion chamber, turbine and the exhaust nozzle have their unique role to play in the working of a turbofan and contribute in providing the necessary thermodynamic and aerodynamic requirements of the overall system. By understanding the individual function of these components, we can determine the performance measures and the complexities that have to be considered in the design of a turbo fan. Before we proceed to the operation of a gas turbine, we will describe the aerodynamic role of individual parts.In this section, we will describe the aerodynamic behavior of the engine components that were mentioned in section 1 in the same order as the air encounters them in a turbofan. Intake g uides the air from the atmosphere to the fan of the engine and assists the engine by increasing the pressure before the air is sucked in by the engine (Gordon). It has an aerodynamic design to minimize the drag and is basically a nozzle with increasing cross section (Jet Propulsion) that results in a higher pressure at the fan. Moreover, its front should not generate any turbulence in the flow of air as it can cause severe conditions inside the engine and lift may dangerously drop. Intake has to accommodate both the bypass and engine streams of air so that no considerable pressure gradients result at the face of the fan. For faulty conditions, intake may have to provide a larger mass of air than normal requirement of an engine and so has to have a reasonable choke limit. 3.2 Fan and Compressor Compressor is the first component of considerable aerodynamic complexity that the air meets in its way to the exhaust. A compressor is made up of several fan-like moving blades called airfoils alternately arranged with the stators are the stationary blades (Figure 2). Figure 2: Axial compressor. (Turbine Engines) The airfoils blow the air ahead and stators decelerate it, thus increasing the pressure with successive sections. There are usually two separate parts of a compressor: the low pressure and the high pressure compressor. This division is necessary because as the pressure increases, the speed of rotating airfoils has to increase. To maintain the air mass flow rate which depends both on the speed of flow and pressure, compressor

Physical fitness Cardio-vascular endurance

Physical fitness Cardio-vascular endurance Fitness components in sport Health related components Cardio-vascular endurance Cardio-vascular endurance is how the body supplies oxygen to fuel the muscles when participating in sport or high endurance events and situations. It does this through the heart, blood vessels, blood and respiratory system. Footballers need cardio-vascular endurance when the play because they need to be able to run throughout the whole 90 mins. Oxygen to the muscles is what allows them to do this. Swimmers need cardio-vascular endurance when they do long distance races e.g. 1500m swimming race where their body need a descent supply of oxygen to the muscles from start to finish. Boxers need to have excellent c-v endurance to be able to compete at a strong pace throughout a fight. Their muscles need oxygen in order to work throughout a fight so that they can throw punch after punch and block after block. Both these motions need the muscles to contract, flex and tense. Muscular endurance Muscular endurance is the ability to perform repetitive or sustained muscular contractions against some resistance for an extended period of time. Muscular endurance allows athletes to do more strenuous work. Footballers need muscular endurance to be able to repeatedly use muscles throughout a match e.g. in sprinting a player uses the quads and caths over and over throughout the game. In swimming they use their muscles continually over the race e.g. in butterfly they use most if not all the bodies muscles to drag themselves through the water. Boxers need muscular endurance to be able to continuously throw punches from round one to round twelve because they need to be swinging away for the whole fight but if they cant then they wont be able to fight the whole twelve rounds. Muscular strength Muscular strength is the ability of an athlete to perform a sport at a sustained high tempo for a short amount of time. Footballers need muscular strength to be able to exert strength when they shoot the ball from a long distance so that it travels fast and with power towards their target. Swimmers use strength when they push of the back board after a length in order to start the next lap. This requires the use and strength from the quads, calfs and foot muscles for the push off. In boxing when a fight needs to dodge a shot they may use the tactic of leaning back to avoid the punch. This requires the use the abdominal muscles. These need strength to be able to support his upper body as he leans back. Flexibility There are two types of flexibility. They are static flexibility and dynamic flexibility. Static is when an athlete slowly stretch and hold the position for a period of time. Dynamic is when an athlete makes a quick movement in which they stretch. In football a goal keeper needs flexibility when he stretches for the ball e.g. when the ball is heading for the top corner. Swimmers need good flexibility to be able to stretch their arms out properly and have a good stroke length e.g. Michael Phellps showed good flexibility when he was waiting on the starting board by showing his arm span and stretching it to its relaxed max before the start of the race. Boxers dont really need too much flexibility but the one time they do need is when they lean back. They stretch the back throughout this movement. Body composition Body composition is the amount of fat, bone and muscle in the human body. Athletes need different body compositions to perform different sports. Footballers need to have a slim body composition because they need to be able to carry their weight around the pitch. If a footballer is fat then it makes it harder to run for long periods and also makes it harder to carry their own body weight. Swimmers need to be slim so that they can travel through the water faster and smoother. Depending on a boxers weight class a boxer needs to big and heavy or thin and light. This is so they can perform fairly at their weight class. Skill-related fitness Balance Balance is a skill that is naturally learnt after birth but can be developed further by an athlete so they can perform their sport properly. Balance is important because we must stay in a state of complete balance when performing are sports So that we dont fall over when performing. Some athletes need more balance than others. Footballers need balance when they shot. They put their arms into a supportive stance for when they hit the ball so that they dont lose their balance. Swimmers need balance when they are getting ready to dive in at the start of a race. A good balance can give them a good start allows them to get a head start. Boxer need balance so they can throw strong punches and put their whole body weight behind the shot also when they dodge shots they need to have good balance to enable them to recover into the stance quicker. Speed Speed is the quickness of a limb over a distance in time but it does not just affect the legs it involves all limbs and body parts from legs, torso to arms. Some footballers need to be fast this needs speed e.g. a winger needs speed because he is expected to run the lines to create the opposition with a problem. Swimmers need speed when they lash through the water to keep a good stroke per minute time. Boxers need speed when they throw a jab so that they can catch the opponent off guard and also so they can get out the way of any counter punches. Power Power is the ability to apply force quickly. A simple equation for power is: muscular strength X speed = Power. http://somatotype.net/nzfitness/pages/CompOFfit.htm . Power contains speed because in order to apply force you need speed. Footballers need power when shooting at goal. They need the quads and the calfs to gather up power on their way to the ball so that the shot can be harder and faster. Swimmers need power to be able to pull them through the water at pace e.g. when they do the freestyle they need to have fast, strong and powerful stokes. Boxer throw punch after punch, these punches need to be fast and power full so that they are unseen and effective e.g. a hook needs to be fast and power full so that the opponent does not see it and even if he does block the shot it will still hurt. Reaction time Reaction time is the time it takes for an athlete to react to a situation that is happening very quickly (The time taken to react to any stimuli). A goal keeper in football needs to have fast reacting times to be able to react to shots coming from 50yds to 2yds. Swimmers need to be able to react to the starting alarm as quickly impossible so that they are not left behind and can establish a lead. For boxers to be able to dodge in coming punches they need to react to the earliest stimuli and duck and swerve out the way. Agility Agility is the ability to stop and change direction or movement quickly. Footballers need agility because the game can change so quickly e.g. the goalkeeper blocks a shoot but the ball lands right in front of the goal, the player with best agility should react quickest and move fastest in order to defend it or strike it into the goal. Swimmers dont really need to be to agile but one place they do need it is when they are turning around for the next length because they need this switch of direction to be as quick as possible also being in water makes it harder because of the extra resistance. Boxers need to be agile unless they want to take hit after hit without getting out the way. When a boxer is be attacked by his opponent he will need the agility in his muscles to be able to move lightening quick to get out the way. Co-ordination Co-ordination is the ability to do something in a combination continuously. Footballers need co-ordination so that they can move the ball fluently between their legs because in football its not just putting on foot in front of the other it also about judging the speed of the ball and your own speed. Then when you shot you need to have placed your feet in the right places this takes co-ordination. Swimmers need co-ordination throughout a race. It quite easy but they need to co-ordinate when they should come up for oxygen so that they dont lose their speedy pace for example in the freestyle the swimmers have a number of strokes that they prefer to do before they come up for oxygen. This is all quite simple but if you lose your count and co-ordination then you can do too many stroke or too few and lose your oxygen pattern.

The QWERTY Phenomenon and the Game of Cricket :: Typing Technology Key Board Essays

The QWERTY Phenomenon and the Game of Cricket In "Darwin's Dangerous Idea", Dennett describes the QWERTY phenomena in biological and cultural evolution as an example of how "mere historical happenstance... restrict[s] our options" (6:131). Economists add a value judgment to this description, some using QWERTY as an example of market failure and inefficiency. However, the evolution of QWERTY, like cricket, follows rules that are enigmatic at first glance. Economists do not pursue the analogy with evolution and, as a result, do not detect the fundamental change in the system of production that rewrote the rules of efficiency. A historical retracing disentangles the reasons for QWERTY's continued dominance of keyboard systems. The integration of parts in the system of production demanded compatibility: the efficiency of the whole above the efficiency of the individual. QWERTY: Rise to fame In the first row of letters on your keyboard, the first six keys spell out a nonsensical string, QWERTY, that gives this layout its name. In the nineteenth century, it was found that if two adjacent keys on a typewriter were struck too quickly in succession, the type bars would jam. The alphabetical arrangement of keys proved to be problematic as it placed many commonly-used letters close together. Spacing these letters apart resulted in the somewhat arbitrary re-arrangement we see today. Given that computers have gotten rid of this mechanical problem, why does QWERTY continue to dominate keyboards around the world? First, a quick history. In the second half of the nineteenth century, typewriters with a variety of key layouts competed for commercial success, and the first to achieve it used QWERTY. Diamond argues, however, that the role the keyboard played in the typewriter's success was incidental rather than instrumental, crediting instead other advantageous components that the machine boasted, such as type bars, an inked ribbon, and a cylindrical paper carriage (2). But as this typewriter became more widely used in offices, more new users chose to train to touch-type using the QWERTY layout. As people climbed on the bandwagon, QWERTY experienced decreasing costs of selection: it became more likely to be picked over other key layouts (1). The "wrong" answer? Early dominance meant not only that QWERTY became the standard, but that it stayed that way too. The layout became locked in by the quasi-irreversibility of investments in training touch-typists and in equipment, and by the high costs of conversion (1). In fact, numerous attempts to implement improvements to the layout have met with failure.